Ref: PN10-02
29 January 2010
The Better Regulation Executive (BRE) and National Audit Office (NAO) have today published the report of their independent review into the Pensions Regulator's risk-based approach to regulation.
One of a series of reviews to audit national regulators' performance against the Better Regulation agenda, the report concludes that the regulator has thoroughly embedded the Hampton principles at both operational and strategic levels - and identifies examples of good practice across the range of areas.
The report highlights a number of key strengths at the regulator, including:
Welcoming the report, Angela Eagle, Minister of State for Pensions and the Ageing Society said:
"Effective regulation to protect members' benefits is essential work. Recognition for implementing good practice is a testament to the ongoing efforts of this important organisation."
Pensions Regulator chief executive Tony Hobman said:
“We are delighted to receive recognition for the progress we have made and we are working hard to ensure our strong performance against the Better Regulation agenda continues in the years to come.
“As the landscape we regulate continues to evolve - and we prepare for our new responsibilities from 2012 - our focus will be on ensuring our risk-based approach to regulation remains fit for purpose.”
In its response to the report, also published today, the regulator highlights the finding that its approach to enforcement has been effective and proportionate.
Figures, published in the response, show that it formerly exercised its powers in 787 of the 4,747 cases and enquiries active between 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009. In the following six months, 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009, powers were formally exercised in 798 of the 3,272 active cases and enquiries.
In most cases, dialogue with pension trustees, the sponsoring employer and their advisers results in matters being resolved satisfactorily. However, the regulator will resort to enforcement where necessary.
The report also identifies three issues for the regulator to focus on in order to meet the Hampton criteria more fully. The report acknowledges that the regulator is addressing these issues already and is fully alive to the risks and challenges it faces in light of the changing pensions landscape and the implementation of the Pensions Act 2008. The issues are also addressed in the regulator's response to today's report.
Background
The recommendations of the Hampton Report of March 2005 and the Macrory Report of 2006 together form the foundations of the Government's vision for a risk-based approach to regulatory inspection and enforcement, as part of its wider Better Regulation agenda.
Since 2007, the Better Regulation Executive and the National Audit Office have been engaged in a programme of independent reviews of all national regulators. The purpose of the HIR programme is to provide a structured and independent check of regulators' performance against the Hampton principles and Macrory principles and characteristics, to highlight areas for development, identify and share good practice in the regulatory community and – where regulators are performing well – to help improve stakeholders' perception of regulation.
The Pensions Regulator underwent its Hampton Implementation Review between 29 June and 3 July 2009.
• Ben Lloyd 01273 627208
• Katherine Long 01273 811859
• Ruth Hallam 01273 627752
• Veena Mapara 01273 627611
• Out of hours 01273 648496
• www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk
Non-press enquiries:
Customer support 0870 6063636
customersupport@thepensionsregulator.gov.uk
| Related documents |
|---|
| Response to the Hampton Implementation Review |